Liberal Slate Magazine condones violence now

Slate is officially making it public that they think violence is appropriate now:

https://twitter.com/Slate/status/1268415955937513473?s=20

Here’s the transcript of what was said:

https://slate.com/transcripts/eHRDMUxHM0lidm9CS0lxaUU0TzJZbnR5ZXU3NWhFV21yMDBTR3gxQ1AvWT0=
 

Now, make of that what you will, but the headline of it is the message. It’s funny, as other Slate headlines (and articles) attempt to strike fear in their readers regarding “violence” and also support gun control:

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/12/paramilitary-groups-anti-private-army-laws.html?via=recirc_recent
 

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/01/militia-richmond-virginia-gun-rally.html
 https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/01/militia-richmond-virginia-gun-rally.html
 

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/09/matt-schaefer-texas-state-lawmaker-rejects-gun-control-hours-after-west-texas-shooting.html
 

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/08/el-paso-dayton-shootings-too-soon-guns-white-supremacy-terror.html
 

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/03/why-cant-us-pass-gun-laws-like-new-zealand.html
 

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/02/assessing-the-gun-control-debate-in-the-year-since-the-parkland-school-shooting.html
 

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/03/citizens-crime-commission-of-new-york-city-richard-aborn-on-gun-control-in-new-york-city.html
 

Blah blah blah you get the idea. Truth is, violence is “ok“ as long as it benefits Democrats and radical change it seems. In fact, it’s “necessary at times”. So what is the main purpose of gun control and why do those that support gun control sometimes support violent revolution? Fact is, they support violence to get their way and they support gun control in order to use it as a weapon against their political opponents. Much easier to control your enemy when they don’t have the proper means to fight back.