Login/SignUp

Spoiler alert: thanks to the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision, these bills are walking into a legal buzzsaw.

HB21 threatens jobs, small businesses, and constitutional rights—all under the guise of “responsible conduct.”

HB 24 is a misguided attempt to restrict reciprocity and complicate lawful concealed carry. Virginians should contact their legislators, voice opposition, and stand for policies that respect constitutional rights, promote clarity, and prioritize real safety measures over political theater.

LET THE DEBUNKING COMMENSE!!!!

Technically, we here at Mom-At-Arms sealed the fate of the last controversial ATF Director (David Chipman) , so might as well dive into this one. When the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) announced Robert Cekada as its Deputy Director in April 2025, it marked the rise of a career lawman to one of the most influential posts in federal firearms regulation. Fast forward to today, November 19, 2025 and he’s been boosted to ATF Director. For those who foll

Virginia Senator Jennifer Carroll Foy (D) has prefiled a bill for the 2026 Legislative Session that claims to establish “standards of responsible conduct” for firearm industry members. On the surface, it sounds like common‑sense regulation. In reality, it’s a sweeping attempt to impose vague, unworkable mandates on manufacturers, dealers, and distributors - opening the door to endless lawsuits, selective enforcement, and back‑door gun control. Let's take this mess she's propo

Sic Semper Tyrannis

“We recognize today’s historic selection of Winsome Sears. The Virginia NAACP does not support a political party. However, we recognize the overwhelming significance of this moment.”

And he sure as hell wouldn’t have voted for a CIA operative!

They extract pain for policy, then vanish when real solutions, like community investment or self-defense training, are proposed

What’s missing from their public bios about teaching people to use the "dangerous and scary weapons" they advocate against?

What are Universal Background Checks (UBCs)?   UBCs are laws that require a criminal background check for every  firearm transfer—whether it’s a sale, gift, or loan—between any  individuals, not just through licensed dealers. That means even handing a rifle to your cousin for hunting or gifting a handgun to your adult child would require government approval. Sounds harmless? It’s not. UBCs are the gateway to surveillance, criminalization, and unconstitutional overreach. The E

By leveraging femvertising, Moms Demand Action doesn’t just market a cause, they reframe the entire cultural conversation around firearms.

As Earle-Sears put it: “Jay Jones fantasizes about murdered little children… and my opponent Abigail Spanberger urges her supporters to fill their hearts with violent hate. ‘Let your rage fuel you,’ she says. Words have meaning.”

Many other outlets are covering this story, but my Mama’s Heart cannot let it go unheard. In May 2025, a quiet act of courage by...

Abigail Spanberger’s gun control proposals may sound like “common sense,” but they risk alienating responsible citizens and failing to address the deeper causes of violence. Instead of sweeping bans and punitive laws, Virginia should invest in firearm safety education, community outreach, and mental health support.

In short, overturning the Second Amendment wouldn’t just disarm gun owners, it would erode the legitimacy of martial arts as a civic discipline and a personal right.

Ferrell-Zabala’s résumé reads like a progressive dream: Black woman, LGBTQ+, Christian faith leader, mother of four, and a veteran of social justice campaigns.

Walking out of class for 30 minutes doesn’t make you an activist... it makes you absent. Real civic engagement requires research, dialogue, and long-term commitment. Walkouts only offer instant gratification: a photo op, a trending hashtag, and the illusion of impact.

Ya see, kids... (legitimate) sleuth work isn’t about what you can dig up—it’s about what sticks. I could give you a million reasons why someone like Shannon Watts deserves scrutiny, with receipts. But that doesn’t mean her followers will suddenly agree with me. Will I rile up those who do? YES! But they're not the ones I'm trying to "influence" with truth, are they?