top of page
Search

State of MN anti-gun attorneys argue young women aren’t eligible for 2A rights under “tradition”

Wow. The case is challenging the constitutionality of under 21 year olds being forbidden in Minnesota to carry firearms. In defense of the permit system in Minnesota, they're (the state twisting the Bruen decision) arguing that women traditionally didn’t get 2A rights and it applies to 18-20 year old males, not females. Unreal, and misogynistic. As we always say, anti-gunners are sexist and racist .....


https://assets.nationbuilder.com/firearmspolicycoalition/pages/6154/attachments/original/1659654673/Worth_v_Harrington_Harrington_MSJ.pdf?1659654673









And this is interesting regarding Harrington. Who knew protecting young women included making sure they were disarmed....


https://www.senate.mn/confirmations/2021-2022/2021-2022_required_docs/Harrington_John.pdf



And let’s not forget who authored this argument to the court:







What a great guy.....


https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/2018/9/25/17901120/keith-ellison-abuse-allegations-minnesota-ag-karen-monahan





bottom of page