Login/SignUp

Founded in 2002, the national organization recruits and trains Democratic women to run for office, providing instruction in campaign strategy, fundraising, communications, public speaking, media relations, endorsements, field operations, and political networking.

Over the last couple of days, I've spent a lot of time digging through the Washington County, VA case, Santolla v. Katz (Case No. CL26-1139), reading the court documents, comparing statements from the Attorney General's Office... which are limited... and Senator Bill Stanley, and trying to answer one question that kept nagging at me: If Judge Campbell's Letter Opinion directed the plaintiffs to draft an "Order Granting Preliminary Injunction," why does everyone keep pointing

... we have private citizens are protecting their individual rights. State organizations are challenging enforcement within Virginia. National organizations are advancing broader constitutional arguments. Now, the United States Department of Justice has entered the fight from an entirely different position, bringing the weight of the federal government into the conversation.

Most of us played the Telephone Game as children. One person whispered a message to the next, who whispered it to another, and so on until the message reached the last person in line. The humor came from hearing the final version. Somehow, what started as a simple sentence often emerged as something entirely different. Words were changed. Details were lost. New details appeared. By the end, the original message was barely recognizable. As children, we laughed. As adults, we s

Courts have less ambiguity to defer to, agencies have less room to expand authority, and future administrations have fewer levers to pull without Congress.

The record does not change because the ending is tragic, and if we are not willing to apply the same scrutiny across the board, then we are not seeking truth.

To understand Virginia politically, you have to go back to the system that shaped it long before modern party labels took hold.

WARNING: A Mini Playbook for Strategic Activism, by Jill S. McDaniel, aka Mom-At-Arms... who knows how to read and research, has a background in marketing and business psychology, and has been in activism longer than most of these influencers you see on IG and TikyTok. Not to mention, if many of you in the 2A World recall, I also helped YOU become "noticed." Please refer back to your DMs before you read further. Cause this one might have ya tucking your tail. Here's a hard tr

Clout chasing dressed up as advocacy does not strengthen a cause. It dilutes it. It confuses people and redirects energy away from where it actually needs to go and gives folks a false sense that they have done something when all they have done is engage with content.

When Pro Second Amendment commentary begins portraying women as constant victims within their own community, it risks reinforcing that same narrative as Gun Control proponents.

I hope Virginians are paying attention, because this pattern isn’t new. Lawmakers like Dan Helmer and Abigail Spanberger fully expect to be sued; that’s part of the political machinery that keeps money and momentum flowing on their side.

Spoiler alert: thanks to the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision, these bills are walking into a legal buzzsaw.

HB21 threatens jobs, small businesses, and constitutional rights—all under the guise of “responsible conduct.”

HB 24 is a misguided attempt to restrict reciprocity and complicate lawful concealed carry. Virginians should contact their legislators, voice opposition, and stand for policies that respect constitutional rights, promote clarity, and prioritize real safety measures over political theater.

When lawmakers introduce bills under the banner of “safety,” it’s worth asking: safety for whom, and at what cost? As part of my personal mission to help in debunking the Gun Control bills coming to the Commonwealth, let's now talk about Virginia’s SB38 . Currently in committee, is framed as a measure to regulate firearm transfers from individuals under protective orders or with certain misdemeanor convictions. But peel back the layers, and you’ll find a bill that adds bureau

It begins in a small town, ordinary on the surface. Children ride their bikes down quiet streets, things like board games encourage imagination, and families gather around dinner tables. The hum of everyday life masks something darker, though. Beneath the calm, a hidden world presses against reality… a place of monsters, fear, and manipulation. Stranger Things: Season 2 (Netflix) The shadows creep in through strange portals. They feed on trauma, thrive on division, and grow s

LET THE DEBUNKING COMMENSE!!!!

Technically, we here at Mom-At-Arms sealed the fate of the last controversial ATF Director (David Chipman) , so might as well dive into this one. When the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) announced Robert Cekada as its Deputy Director in April 2025, it marked the rise of a career lawman to one of the most influential posts in federal firearms regulation. Fast forward to today, November 19, 2025 and he’s been boosted to ATF Director. For those who foll

Virginia Senator Jennifer Carroll Foy (D) has prefiled a bill for the 2026 Legislative Session that claims to establish “standards of responsible conduct” for firearm industry members. On the surface, it sounds like common‑sense regulation. In reality, it’s a sweeping attempt to impose vague, unworkable mandates on manufacturers, dealers, and distributors - opening the door to endless lawsuits, selective enforcement, and back‑door gun control. Let's take this mess she's propo

Values can be manipulated. Morals must be defended.